Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53314 (PNJ)

SATISH KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/12703/2025 · 2025-05-06

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-12703-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12703-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.05.2025 Satish Kumar Gupta ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Naveen Sheokand, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing respondent No.3 to expeditiously adjudicate the Execution Petition No.580 of 2022 in Complaint No.867 of 2020 in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite passing of approximately three years, the aforesaid execution application has not been decided by respondent No.3 till date, which has caused a financial loss to the petitioner. AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.12 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12703-2025 (O&M) -2- 3. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of by giving direction to respondent No.3-Adjudicating Officer, HRERA to look into the matter and decide the Execution Petition No.580 of 2022 pending before it, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of certified copy of this order. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 06.05.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.12 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document