IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89093 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2025 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia ====================================================== Prakash Yadav Son of Bhadai Yadav Resident of Village - Gwalgoanw, P.S.- Baisi, District - Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Subhash Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 25-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 109, 76, 352, 351 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case but then the police after investigation has submitted final form. It is next submitted that petitioner is in custody since 09.10.2025 in the instant case and allegation is of assaulting Pappi Devi by means of Dabiya causing injury on head. It is further submitted that the nature of injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple caused by hard and blunt substance and the blow is not alleged to be repeated and charge sheet has been submitted. It is also Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89093 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into consideration the fact that the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No.216 of 2025. 6. 6. However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the framing of charge or after framing of charge is trying to delay the trial, in both the conditions, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T