1 2025:CGHC:51645 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 5451 of 2025 Ujjwal Diwan S/o Gaurishankar Diwan Aged About 38 Years R/o Near Bright Mukbadhir School Kadambari Nagar Durg, District Durg (C.G.), Pincode 491001 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Vijay Agrawal Superintendent Of Police, District Durg Sp Office Near Patel Chowk Durg (C.G.) Pin 491001 2 - Harshit Mehar City Superintendent Of Police Durg, Csp Office Opposite Old Bus Stand, District Durg (C.G.) Pin 491001 3 - Rajkumar Ghritlahare Thana Incharge Padnabhpur, Police Station Padmnabhpur Behind Bafnamangalam, Padhmanabhpur, District Durg (C.G.) Pin 491001 4 - Uttam Dhruv Sub Divisional Magistrate City, District Durg Collector Office Near Patel Chowk Durg (C.G.) Pin 491001 5 - Sumit Agrawal Commissioner Municipal Corporation, District Durg, Nagar Palika Nigam Behind Bus Stand Durg (C.G.) Pin 491001 6 - Abhijeet Singh Collector District Durg, Collector Office Near Patel Chowk Durg (C.G.) Pin 491001 (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Janu Khare, Advocate For State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, PL VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.10.16 18:26:54 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 16/10/2025 1. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2. By way of this petition, petitioner sought following relief(s) : “10.1. To kindly grant order, or Issue a direction or any other appropriate and Direct the Respondents to pay adequate compensation/exemplary damages to the Petitioner for the substantial financial loss, mental harassment, and irreparable damage to the reputation of the Association caused by the arbitrary, last-minute cancellation. 10.2. Please kindly issue an order granting permission for our conference. 10.3. To Kindly grant order for Due action against the culpable officer. 10.4. To kindly grant any other suitable order or direction as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 3. At the outset, counsel for the State contended that the petitioner has impleded all the Government Officials by name as respondent party instead of their official capacity. 4. On perusal of the present petition, it transpires that the present petition is drafted with the respondent party by name which is defective one, therefore, I am not inclined to entertain the present petition. The petitioner has impleded all the Government Officials by name as respondent party instead of their official capacity, to which learned 3 counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh petition with proper cause title. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant