Vankadara Ravi Kumar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/10328/2021 · 2025-11-23
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53296 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53296 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010177112021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10328/2021 Between:
1. VANKADARA RAVI KUMAR,, S/O. LATE YESANNA,AGED 42YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. 2-66, MAIN ROAD, KALVATALA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 518 123.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AMARAVATHI, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KURNOOL TOWN AND DISTRICT.
4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALLAGADDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , KOLIMIGUNDLA POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus in not registering the FIR (First Information Report)on the Complaint given by the Petitioner, dated. 22/03/2021, which is illegal, arbitrary and also violation of Sections 154 and 156 of the Criminal Procedure Code and also against the Hon'ble Supreme Court
Judgment in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of UP and also violation of guidelines issued by the Central Government vide Circular No.15011/91/2013- SC/ST-W, dated. 12/10/2015, and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 to register the First Information Report on the basis ofthe Complai given by the Petitioner on 02/01/2021 and conduct the enquiryas per the law and protect Petitioner's life and liberty and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y BALAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus in not registering the FIR (First Information Report)on the Complaint given by the Petitioner, dated. 22/03/2021, which is illegal, arbitrary and also violation of Sections 154 and 156 of the Criminal Procedure Code and also against the Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgment in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of UP and also violation of guidelines issued by the Central Government vide Circular No.15011/91/2013- SC/ST-W, dated. 12/10/2015, and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 to register the First Information Report on the basis of the Complaint given by the Petitioner on 02/01/2021 and conduct the enquiry as per the law and protect Petitioner's life and liberty and pass ...”
None represented for the Petitioner.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that Petitioner is in habit of filing complaints and he filed more than 15 criminal cases, out of them, 13 cases were referred as „false‟. In the present case, petitioner never filed any complaint and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh