APHC010215542020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 14202/2020 Between: 1. P RAMAKRISHNA, S/O.VENKATADRI, AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC . AGRL. COOLIE R/O.GUTTAPALYAM VILLAGE, KALIKIRI MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, VALMIKIPURAM MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.14202 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in proposing to distribute the house pattas under the Navaratnalu scheme in the petitioner’s DKT Patta land in an extent of Ac.0.12 ½ cents in Sy.No.579/1 by demolishing the existing house on 22.06.2020 without considering the representation of the petitioner to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 dated 22.06.2020 and 26.06.2020. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter affidavit of the 3rd respondent submits that the subject land was allotted to the APIIC, but the same was not utilized by it. Hence it is proposed for the above said public purpose. 4. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is having DKT patta for the subject land. 5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law and if the petitioner is otherwise found to be in possession of the same, he shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law. However, the petitioner is permitted to make representation afresh, if any, with respect to the subject land, if there is any subsisting cause of action, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. On receipt of such 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.14202 of 2020 representation from the petitioner, the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to consider and dispose of the same, strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned, including the petitioner and upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 18.09.2025 PGT