Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5328 (JHR)

REENA VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./893/2025 · 2025-02-12

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.893 of 2025 ------ 1. Reena Verma, aged about 46 years, wife of Subodh Kumar 2. Subodh Kumar, aged about 52 years, son of Arjun Prasad Both resident of Q. No. CD-665-OHC, Sector- II, P.O. & P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Advocate For the State : Ms. Mohua Palit, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 12-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Sukdeonagar P.S. Case No.594 of 2024 instituted under Section 108 of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have abetted the commission of suicide of Vinita Kumari and the only allegation against the petitioners is that the deceased and others have committed theft of valuable jewelries of them kept in the house of the deceased. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is further submitted that both the bags were kept 1.5 years before the commission of suicide by the deceased, inside the bed box. It is also submitted that there is no connection between the commission of suicide and the alleged allegations of theft made against the deceased. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co- operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Sukdeonagar P.S. Case No.594 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/