Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5328 (HP)

PANNA LAL v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/232/2025 · 2025-03-24

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Panna Lal Vs. State of H.P. Cr. MP(M) No. 232/2025 24.03.2025 Present: Mr. George and Mr. Vinod Kumar Soni, Advocates, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Cr. MP(M) No. 232/2025 For the reasons stated in the application, coupled with the fact that the applicant-appellant is in jail, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 355 days that has crept up in filing the appeal. Ordered accordingly. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal /2025 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Call for the records. Cr. MP No. /2025 Application be registered. Notice. Ms. Sharmila Patial, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. She prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply to the application. ...2... List on 21.04.2025. [ ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 24th March, 2025 (raman)