246-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11710-2023 Date of decision: 02.09.2025 JAGMAL SINGH ...PETITIONER V/S UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate with Ms. Mamta Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arshnoor Singh, Advocate for respondent-UHBNL. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. Instant civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India for quashing of impugned order dated 27.07.2022 (Annexure P-2), whereby, respondent No.4 has been appointed as inquiry officer to conduct the departmental inquiry against the petitioner. 2. Learned senior counsel for the respondents-corporation at the very outset submits that the present revision petition has become infructuous, as the order impugned therein has since been withdrawn and a copy of order, vide which, the impugned order was withdrawn, has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered as infructuous. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) September 02, 2025 JUDGE manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2025.09.03 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document