Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010002182025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/18/2025 AJIT DAS S/O- LATE SUDHIR DAS, R/O- SHIVBARI, W/NO-5, P.O,P.S-HOJAI, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REP BY STANDING COUNSEL OF NARCOTICS CONTROL OF BUREAU 2:NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU REP BY ITS DIRECTOR GUWAHATI ZONAL UNIT VIP ROAD CHACHAL KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22 ASSAM 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR FIRUZ KHAN, MR. ABHIJIT MENA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NCB, PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 22.01.2025 Heard Mr. F. Khan, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Page No.# 2/2 Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant for impleadment of State of Assam, as respondent No. 3, in Bail Application No. 3904/2024. Mr. Khan, learned counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently the State of Assam has not been arrayed in the aforesaid bail application as respondent. But, notice upon the State of Assam has been served and the case diary has also been called for and as such, this interlocutory application may be allowed. On the other hand, Mr. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has received the case diary and also received the notice. In that view of the matter, this court is inclined to allow this interlocutory application by impleading the State of Assam, as respondent No. 3, in Bail Application No. 3904/2024. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant