Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5327 (AP)

Gogineni Raghavamma v. Neelam Syamala,

SA/91/2024 · 2025-04-03

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010044732024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 91/2024 Between: Gogineni Raghavamma ...APPELLANT AND Neelam Syamala ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following: Judgment: It is represented by Sri P. Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the appellant, that the matter has been settled between both the parties outside the Court and that the second appeal has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the second appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Each party is directed to bear their own costs in the second appeal. VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO,J