RAJU MIYA@RAJU ISLAM v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM(A)/461/2025 · 2025-09-04
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53264 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53264 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
04.09.2025 SL No.2 Ct. No.03 Sudipta
Allowed
Calcutta High Court In The Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri
CRM (A) 461 of 2025
In Re: An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Jaigaon Police Station Case No. 62 of 2025 dated 02.04.2025 under Sections 69 / 126 (2) / 115 (2) / 351 (2) / 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
And
In Re : Raju Miya @ Raju Islam ……Petitioner
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Avijit Ghosh
Ms. Sudipa Ghosh
…...Advocates
For the State : Mr. Ujjwal Luksom Ms. Namrata Das …..Advocates
For the de facto complainant : Mr. Arjun Chowdhury Ms. Sunayana Parveen …..Advocates
1. Present application has been filed for anticipatory bail.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and victim both are major. They were neighbour and admittedly developed relationship between them. Learned counsel further submits that
2 the complaint was made after around two months of the alleged incident.
3. Learned counsel for the State submits that in the statement under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C. the de facto complainant has made statement about forcefully rape.
4. Perusal of the FIR indicated that admittedly there was an affair between the petitioner and the victim. The complaint was made around two months after the incident.
5. Thus, taking into account the facts and circumstances, this Court considers that the petitioner is entitled to grant anticipatory bail.
6. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.
7. In the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C., 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further conditions that the petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate or tamper with the
3 witnesses and the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when directed by the Investigating Officer.
8. CRM (A) 461 of 2025 is disposed of.
9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. )