Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53249 (AP)

P Srinivasa Raju v. G SAI PRASAD

CC/1083/2025 · 2025-11-27

B S Bhanumathi

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010210822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Friday, the Twenty eighth day of November, Two Thousand Twenty Five The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No.1083 of Between: 1. P.Srinivasa Raju, S/o.Venkata Satyanarayana Raju, aged about 50 years, Occupation : Contractor, R/o Dharmavarapupeta village, Koyyalagudem mandal, Eluru District. 1. G.Sai Prasad, S/o.Not Principal Secretary, Irrigation, C.A.D. and Rural Water Supply Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. Sri Y. Srinivas, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Vysya Bhavan Hanumanpeta, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District. 3. Sri K.Vetri Selvi, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working as District Collector, Eluru District, Eluru. 4. Sri P.Najarjuna Rao, S/o.not working as Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Eluru, Eluru District, earlier West Godavari District. 5. Sri Deva Prakash, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working as the Executive Engineer, Irrigati earlier West Godavari District. 6. Sri Peeyush Kumar, S/ working as Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Friday, the Twenty eighth day of November, Two Thousand Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No.1083 of 2025 P.Srinivasa Raju, S/o.Venkata Satyanarayana Raju, aged about 50 years, Occupation : Contractor, R/o Dharmavarapupeta village, Koyyalagudem mandal, Eluru District. ...Petitioner and G.Sai Prasad, S/o.Not known, aged about major, presently working as Principal Secretary, Irrigation, C.A.D. and Rural Water Supply Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Sri Y. Srinivas, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working , Minor Irrigation Department, Vysya Bhavan Hanumanpeta, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District. Sri K.Vetri Selvi, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working as District Collector, Eluru District, Eluru. Sri P.Najarjuna Rao, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working as Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Eluru, Eluru District, earlier West Godavari District. ri Deva Prakash, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working as the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Eluru, Eluru District, earlier West Godavari District. , S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working as Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. ...Contemnors IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] Friday, the Twenty eighth day of November, Two Thousand Twenty Five P.Srinivasa Raju, S/o.Venkata Satyanarayana Raju, aged about 50 years, Occupation : Contractor, R/o Dharmavarapupeta village, ...Petitioner known, aged about major, presently working as Principal Secretary, Irrigation, C.A.D. and Rural Water Supply Sri Y. Srinivas, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working , Minor Irrigation Department, Vysya Bhavan Sri K.Vetri Selvi, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working as known, aged about major, presently working as Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Eluru, Eluru ri Deva Prakash, S/o.not known, aged about major, presently working on Division, Eluru, Eluru District, o.not known, aged about major, presently epartment, ontemnors 2 BSB, J C.C.No.1083 of 2025 Counsel for the petitioner: 1. Bokka Satyanarayana Counsel for the contemnors: 1. Sushma Yaganti 2. Ramakrishna Pativada 3 BSB, J C.C.No.1083 of 2025 The Court made the following order: This contempt case is filed under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for the willful disobedience of the order dated 05.08.2024 passed in W.P.No.14485 of 2024, by the respondents. 2. The counsel for the petitioner represented that the order had been complied and that the petition may be closed. 3. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated :28.11.2025 GRL 4 BSB, J C.C.No.1083 of 2025 456 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI Contempt Case No.1083 of 2025 Date: 28-11-2025 GRL