Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53247 (AP)

C VENKATA RAMUDU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13297/2024 · 2025-12-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010266022024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13297/2024 Between: 1. C VENKATA RAMUDU, S/O C.NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O 2-214, KRISTAPADU VILLAGE, PEDDAVADUGURU (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 2. C.CHAKRAVARTHI, S/O C.VENKATA RAMUDU, AGED 33 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O 2-580, KRISTAPADU VILLAGE, PEDDAVADUGURU (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDDAVADUGURU POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. POLA PAVAN KUMAR, S/O POLA RANGA SWAMY, AGED 25 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O 2-2, KRISTAPADU VILLAGE, PEDDAVADUGURU (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action on the part of Officials of Respondent No.3 in issuing directions to Petitioners to pay an amount of Rs.4, 60, 000-00 to 4th Respondent which are alleged to be due to 4th Respondent from 3rd Party as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to not to call the 2 Petitioners to Police Station for resolving any civil dispute which arose between Petitioners and 4th Respondent herein and to pass.” 2. Heard Sri N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.12.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13297 of 2024 Dt..22.12.2025 Asr