Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53245 (ALL)

MADHURI PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15239/2025 · 2025-10-08

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15239 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Bhagwan Dutt Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Narendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3&4 and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondents to provide the family pension and other benefits to the petitioners on account of death of their husband, regular employee, who died during service as well as further prayer to direct the respondent nos.3 and 4 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners contained in representations for being provided family pension and other benefits to the petitioners on account of death of their husband, regular employee who died during service. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for ventilation of their grievances, the petitioners have approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioners, no heed has yet been paid. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.3&4 submits that in case petitioners move a fresh application/representations before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhagwan Dutt Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Narendra Pratap Singh Madhuri Pandey And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioners may make fresh application/representations, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3; Gorakhpur Development Authority, Gorakhpur through its Secretary within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. October 9, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 15239 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad