SMT. ANJALI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/13831/2025 · 2025-05-22
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53235 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53235 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:89228 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13831 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Anjali And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar,Ulajhan Singh Bind Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Learned Standing Counsel for the State has handed over a copy of the instructions, the same is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
3. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought.
4. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No. 0075 of 2025, under Sections 87, 352, 351(3) BNS and Sections 3(1)(द), 3(1)(घ) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, Police Station-Purkazi, District-Muzaffarnagar, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 23.5.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad