Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010576432025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 30028/2025 Between:
1. K PRASAD, S/O K. MUNIRATHNAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC CIVIL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR, R/O. KAMATHAMPALLI VILLAGE, ERRUPALLI POST, IRALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOR DISTRICT, CHITTOR.
3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOR DISTRICT, CHITTOR.
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR DIVISION, CHITTOOR.
5. THE TAHSILDAR, IRALA MANDAL, IRALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
2
VS,J
W.P.NO.30028 OF 2025
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus, declare the Proceedings Vide D.Dis(G)/1614/2025, dt.27-09-2025 issued by the 4th Respondent initiated the Disciplinary proceedings and there by suspended the Authorization of the Petitioner in fair price Shop Dealership No. 1052012 as illegal, arbitrary and a violation of the Principles of Natural Justice, Violation of A.P. Schedule Communities Dealers (License and Regulation) Orders, 2008,Violation of Andhra Pradesh State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)
Order, 2018 and violation of Article-14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the Proceedings Vide D.Dis(G)/1614/2025, dt. 27-09-2025 viz. framing of charges and suspension Orders issued by the 4th Respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to suspend the Impugned Proceedings Vide D.Dis(G)/1614/2025, dt.27-09-2025 issued by the 4th Respondent, initiated the Disciplinary proceedings and thereby suspended the Authorization of the Petitioner in fair price shop No. 1052012 and duly directing the Respondents to supply the Commodities to the Petitioner for distribution. Pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3
VS,J
W.P.NO.30028 OF 2025
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following:
4
VS,J
W.P.NO.30028 OF 2025
ORDER
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“….to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus, declare the Proceedings Vide D.Dis(G)/1614/2025, dt.27-09-2025 issued by the 4th Respondent initiated the Disciplinary proceedings and there by suspended the Authorization of the Petitioner in fair price Shop Dealership No.1052012 as illegal, arbitrary and a violation of the Principles of Natural Justice, Violation of A.P. Schedule Communities Dealers (License and Regulation) Orders, 2008, Violation of Andhra Pradesh State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2018 and violation of Article-14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the Proceedings Vide D.Dis(G)/1614/2025, dt.27-09-2025 viz. framing of charges and suspension Orders issued by the 4th Respondent...”
2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies has furnished a copy of proceedings of the 4th respondent vide D.Dis(G)/1809/2025, dated 26.10.2025, cancelling the petitioner’s authorization. The said fact was admitted by the petitioner, stating that the said proceedings were served on him yesterday in the evening and that the same was also antedated.
3. Since proceedings were already issued by the 4th respondent on 26.10.2025, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh writ petition, challenging the said proceedings.
5
VS,J
W.P.NO.30028 OF 2025
4. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date :05.11.2025 LSP
6
VS,J
W.P.NO.30028 OF 2025
275
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 30028/2025
Date :05.11.2025 LSP