HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13596 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. This has been taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State respondents. 3. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Case No. 6162 of 2019 (State vs. Irshad Khan and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 0038 of 2019 under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 325, 308 IPC, P.S. Bithari Chainpur, District Bareilly pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly as well as summoning/cognizance order dated 14.11.2019 passed by the ACJM, Court o. 8 Bareilly on the basis of compromise dated 11.3.2024. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and the opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicants. 4. On the other hand, learned AGA for the State has no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants. 5. In view of the fact that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Irshad Khan And 8 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Case No. 6162 of 2019 (State vs. Irshad Khan and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 0038 of 2019 under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 325, 308 IPC, P.S. Bithari Chainpur, District Bareilly pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly as well as summoning/cognizance order dated 14.11.2019 passed by the ACJM, Court o. 8 Bareilly on the basis of compromise dated 11.3.2024 are hereby quashed. 7. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 23, 2025 Abhishek A482 No. 13596 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad