Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
331
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24667-2025 Date of Decision:04.08.2025 Anne Sam …Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Anr.
…Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Ms. Jyotsna, Advocate for Mr. Parmod Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Aashish Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S for quashing of FIR No. 338, dated 29.05.2023, registered under Sections 323,324,506 of IPC, Police Station Sector-10, Gurugram, District Gurugram (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise.
2. Vide order dated 07.05.2025, while issuing notice of motion, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise.
3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gurugram and got their statements recorded. Report dated 06.06.2025 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. HITESH 2025.08.05 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh
CRM-M-24667-2025 -2
4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file.
5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners.
6. Resultantly, FIR No. 338, dated 29.05.2023, registered under Sections 323,324,506 of IPC, Police Station Sector-10, Gurugram, District Gurugram (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 04.08.2025
JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.08.05 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh