Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53225 (CHH)

RAJENDRA YADAV v. LAXMINATH

SA/688/2019 · 2025-12-16

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 688 of 2019 1 - Rajendra Yadav S/o Late Kamta Prasad Yadav Aged About 40 Years R/o Village And Post Office Banbaghera, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Parvati Bai Wd/o Late Kamta Prasad Yadav Aged About 72 Years R/o Village And Post Office Banbaghera, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Muktika W/o Shri Girdhar Yadav Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Tumgaon, Post Office Tumgaon, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Karnika W/o Shri Umlesh Yadu Aged About 48 Years R/o Goverdhan Chowk, Mahmai Para, Old Basti, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Laxminath S/o Banshilal Through Shri Ranveer Chane, House No. 265, Deepak Nagar, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) Order Sheet 17/12/2025 None for the appellants. Shri Arvind Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. Even in second round, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of appellant to press the appeal. Thus, this court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder