APHC010541252004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 11434/2004 Between: 1. SRI VEERANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR, REP., BY SRI NEELI THIKKA RAM, S/O GOPAL NAIDU, R/O CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPT HYD 3 OTHERS, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, CHITTOOR. 4. SRI M CHENGAL RAYAN JR ASSISTANT/MANAGER, SRI JEEVA KARUNYA ANNA DANA SAMAJAM, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings of the first respondent in Rc.No.E5/230/25/2004 dated 29-5-2004 as illegal, improper, unjust and arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to law and further declare the letter of 4th respondent dt.14-6-2004 as illegal and arbitrary and to passed without jurisdiction IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 14543 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings of the first respondent Nos.1 and 4 in Rc.No.E5/230/25/2004 dated 29-05-2004, letter No.Nil, dated 14-6-2004 respectively IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file counter affidavit along with relevant records in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K G KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri K.G.Krishna Moorthy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in contact with him for a long time and he has no instructions in the matter. 2. Since the matter pertains to the year 2004, the party should invariable be in contact with his advocate, however, in the present case, the petitioner had not been pursuing the case through his advocate, it shows that the petitioner had no interest in pursuing the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 22nd September, 2025 RKS