Bethireddy Uday Venkata Bhaskar Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/6479/2020 · 2025-09-17
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53222 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53222 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010104232020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6479/2020 Between:
1. BETHIREDDY UDAY VENKATA BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O AMMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RIO 18TH WARD, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. BETHIREDDY AMMIREDDY,, S/O LATE GANGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RIO 18TH WARD, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT.
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI, ELURU.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, W.G.DIST.
5. THE TADEPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP BY PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, TADEPALLI VILLAGE, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following:
3
Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in intending to allot the Cart-Track (bandi dari) of an extent of Acre 03-00 cents in S.No.445 of Tadepalli Village, Tadepalligudem Mandal, West Godavari District as house sites under Navaratnalu-pedalandariki IIIu scheme.
3. On the other hand the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the subject land is not used for the public purpose, as an alternative land was identified for the above said public purpose.
4. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders, if any, stands vacated.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 18.09.2025 PNS