Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5322 (JHR)

KAILASH MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1606/2025 · 2025-03-28

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 1552 of 2025 Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Kr. @ Pankaj Kumar Mandal, aged about 20 years, son of Ugal Mandal, resident of village Pandiniya, P.O and P.S. Ahilyapur, District Giridih, Jharkhand --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party With B.A No. 1606 of 2025 Kailash Mandal, aged about 28 years, son of Budhan Mandal, resident of village Pandiniya, P.O and P.S. Ahilyapur, District Giridih, Jharkhand --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party With B.A No. 1589 of 2025 Deepak Mandal, aged about 21 years, son of Nageshwar Mandal, resident of village Ghosko, P.O and P.S. Ahilyapur, District Giridih, Jharkhand --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioners: Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P. [B.A. 1552/2025] Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, special P.P. [B.A. 1606/25] Mrs. Lily Sahay, A.P.P [B.A. 1589/25] --- 05 / 28.03.2025 All these bail applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, they are being disposed of by a common order. Heard the parties. 2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Giridih (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 111, 317(4), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66 (B) 66(C), and 66(D) of I.T. Act pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Giridih. 3. On 07.12.2024, Cyber Police, Giridih on the basis of confidential information that unknown persons have assembled at village Ahardih, raided the place of occurrence and apprehended the petitioners along with co-accused persons. On search, mobile phones and other articles were recovered from their possession. 2. 4. Mr. Zaid Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submitted that no victim has turned up to claim that the petitioners have cheated anyone. 5. Learned A.P.Ps have opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Giridih in connection with Giridih (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024. (Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded