Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5322 (CHH)

MANISH MANDAVI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/339/2025 · 2025-01-29

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:5254-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 339 of 2025 1 - Manish Mandavi S/o Govind Ram Mandavi Aged About 18 Years R/o Village - Chechanmeta, Police Station - Saja, District - Bemetara (C.G.). --- (Accused Persons). 2 - Omprakash Mandavi S/o Narayan Mandavi Aged About 31 Years R/o Village - Chechanmeta, Police Station - Saja, District - Bemetara (C.G.). 3 - Govind Mandavi S/o Narayan Mandavi Aged About 45 Years R/o Village - Chechanmeta, Police Station - Saja, District - Bemetara (C.G.). 4 - Tilesh Netam S/o Chumman Netam Aged About 33 Years R/o Village - Korway, Police Station - Saja, District - Bemetara (C.G.). ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station - Saja, District - Bemetara (C.G.). 2 - Krishna Sahu S/o Shri Ishwar Sahu Aged About 19 Years R/o Village - Biranpur, Police Station - Saja, District Bemetara (C.G.). --- (Complainant). ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For Respondent-State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 29.01.2025 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition when the case is called out. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.01.29 17:36:23 +0530 2 2. Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State, is present. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and also be pleased to quash the FIR bearing Crime No.276/2024 registered at Police Station Saja, District Bemetara (C.G.), in the interest of justice.” 4. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu