Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53214 (PNJ)

MOHIN NAWAZ v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CRWP/4562/2025 · 2025-05-06

Meenakshi I Mehta, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Mohin Nawaz Union of India and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present: Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Verma, Sr. Panel Counsel for UOI. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. In ordinary course since the rigorous imprisonment for three years has been awarded to the petitioner who had filed an appeal before the Armed Forces Tribunal and the notice has been issued in the appeal which was accepted by the counsel appearing for the respondents and on that very date the learned AFT ought to have heard the case on suspension of sentence. 2. It is informed that the petiti custody. 3. In view thereto, we deem it appropriate to suspend the remaining sentence of the petitioner and release requisite bail bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/ Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh. 4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 5. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. 06.05.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP- Date of Decision: Mohin Nawaz Vs. Union of India and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Verma, Sr. Panel Counsel for UOI. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) In ordinary course since the rigorous imprisonment for three years has been awarded to the petitioner who had filed an appeal before the Armed Forces Tribunal and the notice has been issued in the appeal which was accepted by the counsel appearing for the respondents and on that very date the learned AFT ought to have heard the case on suspension of sentence. It is informed that the petitioner has already suffered 99 days of In view thereto, we deem it appropriate to suspend the remaining of the petitioner and release him on bail subject to his furnishing requisite bail bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfacti Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) ( 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -4562-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Verma, Sr. Panel Counsel for UOI. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) In ordinary course since the rigorous imprisonment for three years has been awarded to the petitioner who had filed an appeal before the Armed Forces Tribunal and the notice has been issued in the appeal which was accepted by the counsel appearing for the respondents and on that very date the learned AFT ought to have heard the case on suspension of sentence. oner has already suffered 99 days of In view thereto, we deem it appropriate to suspend the remaining him on bail subject to his furnishing to the satisfaction of the Registrar, The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No In ordinary course since the rigorous imprisonment for three years has been awarded to the petitioner who had filed an appeal before the Armed Forces Tribunal and the notice has been issued in the appeal which was accepted by the counsel appearing for the respondents and on that very date the learned oner has already suffered 99 days of In view thereto, we deem it appropriate to suspend the remaining him on bail subject to his furnishing on of the Registrar, RAJESH KUMAR 2025.05.08 13:22 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.