Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53213 (KAR)

SMT SHRIDEVI v. THE COMMISSIONER FOR

WP/107128/2025 · 2025-09-25

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13444 WP No. 107128 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 107128 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SHRIDEVI W/O. SHARNAPPA TALAKERI, AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O. BODURU VILLAGE, TQ. YELBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL-583236. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.C. JNANAYYASWAMI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICE M.S. BUILDING AT BENGALURU-01. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOPPAL PRESIDENT OF SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR RECRUITMENT OF ANAGANWADI WORKERS/HELPERS, KOPPAL-583239. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT KOPPAL AND CO-PRESIDENT OF SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR RECRUITMENT ANAGANWADI WORKERS/HELPERS, KOPPAL-583239. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, FIRST FLOOR, HOSAPETE ROAD, KOPPAL-583239. Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13444 WP No. 107128 of 2025 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICE YELBURGA, TQ: YELBURGA, DIST: KOPPAL-583239. 6. THE TALUKA HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER, YELBURGA AND MEMBER OF SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR RECRUITMENT ANAGANWADI WORKER/HELPERS, KOPPAL-583239. 7. TALUKA SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER YELBURGA AND MEMBER OF SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR RECRUITMENT ANAGANWADI WORKER/HELPERS, KOPPAL-583239. 8. EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT YELBURGA-583236, MEMBER OF SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR RECRUITMENT ANAGANWADI WORKER/HELPERS, KOPPAL. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.H. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1 TO R7; SRI. VIJAYKUMAR BALIGERIMATH, ADV. FOR R8) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, 1. ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED PROVISIONAL SELECTION LIST (AT SI NO.72) FOR RECRUITMENT OF ANGANWADI WORKER IN RESPECT OF KRISHNAPURA VILLAGE TQ. YELBURGA KOPPAL DIST, AS PER ANNEXURE-E DATED 19.08.2025 BEARING NO.UNIKO/ MAMAAE/ AUMKAAKA/AUMSA/ TA.AAA.PA/2025-26/856 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 4 COMMITTEE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. 2. ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS DEPARTMENT TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTION OF THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-F DATED 25.08.2025 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13444 WP No. 107128 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. 2. Sri.Vijaykumar Belgerimath, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent No.3. 3. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: 1. Issue writ in the nature of Certiorari to Quash the impugned Provisional selection list (at SI No.72) for recruitment of Anganwadi worker in respect of Krishnapura Village Tq. Yelburga Koppal Dist, as per Annexure-E dated 19.08.2025 bearing No.UNiKO/ MaMaAE/ AumKaaka/AumSa/ Ta.Aaa.Pa/2025-26/856 passed by Rspondent No.2 and 4 committee, in the interest of justice and equity. 2. Issue writ in the nature of Mandamus and directing the respondents department to consider the objection of the petitioner as per Annexure-F dated 25.08.2025 in the interest of justice and equity. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the name of the petitioner was not mentioned in the provisional list even though the petitioner has higher marks and in - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13444 WP No. 107128 of 2025 that background the petitioner has submitted objections to the respondents. The apprehension is that without considering the said objections, the final list would be published. 5. Once the objections have been submitted by the petitioner, it would have to be considered by the respondents before issuance of a final list. The apprehension on the part of the petitioner is misplaced. Hence I pass the following: ORDER i. Writ petition is allowed. ii. A mandamus is issued directing the respondents to consider the objections of the petitioner at Annexure-F before publishing the final list. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13444 WP No. 107128 of 2025 iii. IA No.1/2025 is allowed. Production of certified copy of Annexure-E is dispensed with. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47