DEVENDER SINGH AND ANR. v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
CWP/6220/2008 · 2025-09-24
Jagmohan Bansal
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53211 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53211 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 589
CWP-6220-2008 Date of Decision: 24.09.2025
DEVENDER SINGH AND ANR. ...Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
…Respondents And
Sr. No. Case No. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s)
2. CWP-14530-2008 Devender Singh and Anr. State of Haryana and Ors.
3. CWP-12420-2009 (O&M) Om Parkash and Anr. State of Haryana and Ors.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate with
Mr. Sumbhav Parmar, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG Haryana
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned State counsel submits that issue involved herein is no more res integra. A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 27.07.2020 passed in CWP-13496-2009 titled as ‘Om Parkash and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.’, has adjudicated the issue. SLP filed against said judgment stands dismissed.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner expressed his inability to controvert application of aforesaid judgment to the instant case.
3.
Dismissed in terms of Om Parkash (supra).
DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.24 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-6220-2008
-2-
4.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE September 24, 2025 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.24 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document