Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5321 (KAR)

SMT. DODDAWWA W/O NAGAPPA KALLESHANAVAR v. ALLASAB S/O HUDDRNAB VALIKAR

MFA.CROB/100110/2022 · 2025-02-13

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL CROB NO. 100110 OF 2022 (MV) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DODDAWWA W/O NAGAPPA KALLESHANAVAR AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O: CHULAMUR VILLAGE TQ. RAMDURG, DIST. BELAGAVI- 591126. 2. SUNANDA D/O NAGAPPA KALLESHANAVAR, AGE: 17 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: CHULAMUR VILLAGE, TQ. RAMDURG, DIST. BELAGAVI- 591126, MINOR BY M/G MOTHER SMT. DODDAVVA W/O NAGAPPA KALLESHANAVAR, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O: CHULAMUR VILLAGE, TQ. RAMDURG, DIST. BELAGAVI- 591126. 3. GANGAPPA S/O KALLAPPA KALLESHANAVAR, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O: CHULAMUR VILLAGE, TQ. RAMDURG, DIST. BELAGAVI- 591126. 4. SMT. FAKIRAVVA GANGAPPA KALLESHANAVAR, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: CHULAMUR VILLAGE, 2 TQ. RAMDURG, DIST. BELAGAVI- 591126. ...CROSS OBJECTORS (BY SRI. SHAILA BELLIKATTI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ALLASAB S/O HUDRNAB VALIKAR, AGE: MAJOR, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO. 34A HIREKOPPA GADAG, TALUKA AND DIST. GADAG. 2. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., E#8EPIP SITAPURA INDUSTRIAL AREA, JAIPUR RAJASTAN, PIN- 302022. …RESPONDENTS * * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal CROB filed Under Order 41 Rule 22 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Award dated 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2013 passed in MVC No.2444/2011 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court & Additional MACT, Saundatti. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R Finally two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. Failing to do so, appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. SD/- JUDGE 3 //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 07.03.2025, the Advocate for Cross Objector has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA CROB No.100110 of 2022 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 13.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: gtb C By: mh