APHC010220242012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 39675/2012 Between: 1. K.SREE KUMARI, W/O D.VENKATARAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O 6-3-7, KAPU STREET, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. VIKARAMA SIMHAPURI UNIVERSITY, NELLORE REP BY ITS REGISTRAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. SRI RAMAKRISHNA GONELA, SUPERINTENDENT, VIKRAMASIMHAPURI UNIVERSITY, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings No.E.1/Estt./NonTeaching /2012 dated 3-10-2012 of the 1st respondent appointing the 2nd respondent as Superintendent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Rules and consequently set aside the proceedings No.E.11Estt./Non-Teaching /2012 dated 3-10-2012 of the 1st respondent and direct the 1st respondent to promote the petitioner as Superintendent, IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 50402 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of the lst respondent passed in No.E.1 /Estt./Non- Teaching /2012 dated 3-10-2012 pending disposal of the above Writ petition, IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 29684 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.07.2013 for promotion to the post of AAO at VSU P.G. Center, Kavali forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 50774 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to consider the claims of the petitioner for promotion to the post of AAO at VSU P.G. center, Kavali or Superintendent post forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C SUDESH ANAND The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 05.12.2025 TVN 147 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.39675 OF 2012 Date: 05.12.2025 TVN