Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53191 (PNJ)

PAPPU @ RAJBIR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/6238/2018 · 2025-09-22

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 270 CRM-M-6238-2018 Date of decision: 22.09.2025 PAPPU @ RAJBIR AND ANOTHER ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Akshat Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the FIR No. 260 dated 24.11.2017 registered under Section 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station City Sohna, District Gurugram alongwith all subsequential proceedings arising therefrom. Counsel for the petitioner contends that he has no instructions in the matter. Learned State Counsel further submits that petitioner No.1 died in 2021. VISHAL SHARMA 2025.09.24 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-6238-2018 -2- In view the subsequent developments, Counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition at this stage and prays for liberty to the petitioner to take all pleas before the trial Court. Disposed of as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.09.24 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document