Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53183 (PNJ)

VINITA JOSHI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/12590/2024 · 2025-08-18

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 254-1. CWP-12590-2024 Date of Decision:18.08.2025 VINITA JOSHI ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Munish Jolly, Advocate and Mr. Kamal Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kanav Singla, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Ravinder Saxena, Advocate and Mrs. Savita Saxena, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a xerox copy of settlement agreement/compromise dated 24.05.2025 entered into between the parties before the Lok Adalat. He submits that in view of the settlement, writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 18.08.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.08.22 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh