Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53182 (KAR)

SHRI MALAYYA S/O MALLAYYA BADAMI v. SHRI IRAYYA S/O MALLAYYA BADAMI

RSA/100296/2024 · 2025-02-17

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO 100296 OF 2024 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1 . SHRI MALAYYA S/O MALLAYYA BADAMI AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HARADOLLI, TQ. GULEDGUDD, DIST. BAGALKOT-587203. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI./: SHIVRAJ S BALLOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI IRAYYA S/O MALLAYYA BADAMI AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HANGARAGI, TQ. GULEDGUDD, DIST. BAGALKOTE-587203 & OTHERS. …RESPONDENTS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.10.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.106/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOTE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.09.2020, PASSED IN O.S.NO.7/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, BADAMI, 2 DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Finally, three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 26.03.2025 Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RSA No. 100296/2024 stands dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution as per the Court Order dated 17.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: nth C- By: vk