APHC010283492019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 12964/2019 Between: 1. SMT. MATURI LAKSHMI, W/O.SRINIVAS CHAKRAVATHI AGED YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.NO.33-1-33/ 1, PLOT NO.1-104, JYOTHI ENCLAVE, ALLIPURAM MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GAJUWAKA POLICE STATION, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. TAHSILDAR, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. GODAVARTHI SATYANARAYANA, S/O. VENKANNA R/O.14- 10-2/7,BC ROAD, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. GODAVARTHI RAMA KRISHNA, S/O. VENKANNA R/O.14-10- 2/7, BC ROAD, GAJUWAKA VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. ANNEPU NARASIMHA APPARAO, S / O. LATE RAMAKRSIHAN RAO AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. KALINGA NAGAR, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.12964 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not registering the FIR on the report of the petitioner dated 8.8.2019 supported by the report of 3rd respondent in Rc.No.1903/SA/dt. -08-2019 and 8.8.2019 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of statutory obligation under Section 154(1) of Cr PC and to consequently direct the respondents No.2 to register the FIR on the report of the petitioner which is supported by the report of 3rd respondent, and to pass…” 2. Sri G.Saideep, leaned counsel representing Sri V.V.Satish, learned Counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 08.10.2025 Pmk 4 04 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:12964 OF 2019 Date: 08.10.2025 Pmk