Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5318 (DEL)

ABHISHEK v. STATE NCT OF DELHI

BAIL APPLN./3139/2025 · 2026-07-13

Manoj Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BAIL APPLN. 3139/2025 1 $~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3139/2025 ABHISHEK .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State with Insp. Manish Bhati. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 13.07.2026 1. The applicant seeks regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.0443/2016 dated 27.08.2016, registered at P.S. Bhulswa Dairy, Delhi for commission of offences under Sections 323/307/452/34 IPC. 2. There are, in all, seven accused persons and as per Ms. Dolly Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, all the other accused are already on bail. 3. It will be important to mention that in terms of order passed by the learned Predecessor Bench, a report was sought from the learned Trial Court, which is on record. The report would indicate that the abovesaid Court, which was, earlier, lying vacant, is presently seized with number of cases wherein also, there are directions from this Court to expedite the trial. 4. Learned Trial Court has indicated in the abovesaid report that every effort would be made to conclude the trial, as expeditiously as possible and has sought time of around eight months. 5. Learned APP for the State submits that the allegations are serious as the applicant was in a relationship with the deceased and when such relationship was snapped by her, it made him furious and he, with the help of others, burnt her alive. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 11:33:39 BAIL APPLN. 3139/2025 2 6. Undoubtedly, all the other accused are already on bail and incarceration period of the applicant is already substantially high as he is behind the bar for around seven years. 7. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the applicant, in all fairness, does not press the present application but seeks liberty to revive the present application if the matter is not disposed of within the time-frame expressed by the learned Trial Court. 8. In view of the above, the present application is disposed of as not pressed. 9. The learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the disposal of the matter and to ensure that the case is disposed of on or before 31.10.2026. 10. Needless to say, all the accused persons shall render due assistance and cooperation to the learned Trial Court to achieve the abovesaid time-bound disposal of the matter. 11. It is, however, made clear that in case the matter is not disposed of by the abovesaid cut-off date, the applicant would be at liberty to revive the present application by moving appropriate application. 12. A copy of this order be sent to the learned Trial Court for information and compliance. MANOJ JAIN, J JULY 13, 2026/ss/sa This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 11:33:39