APHC010051752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2942/2024 Between: 1. MATTA RAMESH, S/O LATE CHANDRARAO, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO.3-31/A, GOVINDAPURAM VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM RURAL POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM RURAL MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TWO TOWN POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SURAPU GURAYYA, S/O LATE APPAYA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O BALAGA METTU, BESIDE CONSUMER COURT, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. SURAPU APPALASWAMY, S/O LATE APPAYYA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O BALAGA METTU, BESIDE CONSUMER COURT, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2 7. SURAPU HEMA SUNDARARAO, S/O APPALASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O BALAGA METTU, BESIDE CONSUMER COURT, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with civil disputes pending between me and the respondents 5 to 7 and insisting the petitioner to vacate and handover the land admeasuring Ac. 21.75 cents in Survey No.435/P situated in Balaga Mettu, Srikakulam Town and Mandal, Srikakulam District which is plaint schedule property in O.S.No.15 of 2024 on the file of Learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Srikakulam, is illegal, arbitrary and without there being any authority of law as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in civil disputes pending between me and the respondents 5 to 7 and not to interfere with my personal liberty and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the respondents 5 to 7 vide O.S.No.l5 of 2024 on the file of Learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Srikakulam and also not to interfere with the personal liberty, pending disposal of main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2942 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with civil disputes pending between me and the respondents 5 to 7 and insisting the petitioner to vacate and handover the land admeasuring Ac. 21.75 cents in Survey No.435/P situated in Balaga Mettu, Srikakulam Town and Mandal, Srikakulam District which is plaint schedule property in O.S.No.15 of 2024 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Srikakulam, is illegal, arbitrary and without there being any authority of law as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in civil disputes pending between me and the respondents 5 to 7 and not to interfere with my personal liberty.…” 2. Heard Sri Srinivas Ambati, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between 4 the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2942 of 2024 Dated.05.12.2025 UPS 257