APHC010534702024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27801/2024 Between: 1. ANNEPU NARASAMMA, W/O LATE SRI RAMA MURTHY, AGED 66 YEARS R/O KANIMETTA VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. ANNEPU SIVA PRASAD,, S/O LATE SRI RAM MURTHY, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O KANIMETTA VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. ANNEPU NAGABHOSHAN RAO,, S/O LATE SRI RAMA MURTHY, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O KANIMETTA VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. ANNEPU VENKATA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O LATE SRI RAMA MURTHY, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O KANIMETTA VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONE TOWN POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONE TOWN POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM 4. TRIPURANA VENKATA RATNAM, D/O LATE RAGHAVA DASU, AGED 76 YEARS, R/O SHANTI NAGAR COLONY, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in calling us to police station and making us to sit there till late night pressuring us to vacate our Plot No. 16 in TS.No.725, part of Patha Srikakulam Town and to give it to the 4th respondent and threatening us with dire consequences of implicating in false cases and thus interfering with the civil disputes illegal, arbitrary, malafide and against the fundamental rights and consequently not to call us to the Police Station to make us to sit there and thus not to interfere with any civil disputes between us and the 4th respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased issue an interim direction against the respondents not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent pertaining to Plot No. 16 in T.S No.725, part of Patha Srikakulam Town by calling them to the Police Station threatning to vacate the said plot during the pendency of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. TAMADA RAMJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27801 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in calling us to police station and making us to sit there till late night pressuring us to vacate our Plot No. 16 in TS.No.725, part of Patha Srikakulam Town and to give it to the 4th respondent and threatening us with dire consequences of implicating in false cases and thus interfering with the civil disputes illegal, arbitrary, malafide and against the fundamental rights and consequently not to call us to the Police Station to make us to sit there and thus not to interfere with any civil disputes between us and the 4th respondent and to pass.…” 2. None represented for the petitioners. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondent and not insisting the petitioner to vacate the subject property. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, except under due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs. Page 4 of 5 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27801 of 2024 Dated.30.12.2025 TVN 232