- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2872 WP No. 107629 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 107629 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. GURAYYA S/O. BASAYYA KAMBI, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. ANAGWADI, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. KAREVVA W/O. LAKKAPPA PASANDAVAR, AGE: 50 YEARS, R/O. ANAGWADI, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPT. OF REVENUE, BY ITS SECRETARY, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT. 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER, REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION, UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT, NAVANAGAR BAGALKOT. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2872 WP No. 107629 of 2014 5. THE REHABILITATION OFFICER, REHABILITATION CENTER, UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT, BILAGI. 6. SANGAYYA S/O. GURAYYA KAMBI, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. REHABILITATION CENTRE, ANAGAWADI, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 7. ERAYYA S/O. GURAYYA KAMBI, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. REHABILITATION CENTRE, ANAGAWADI, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SANTOSH B. MANE, ADVOCATE FOR R1, SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R2 TO R5, NOTICE TO R6 & R7 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING NO. Kra/PraAB/Court Adesh/viniv-94/14-15/766 DATED 18.06.2014 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.5 AS PER ANNEXURE-A. PASS ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS JUST AND PROPER UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING AWARD OF COSTS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2872 WP No. 107629 of 2014 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit on instructions that the matter been settled out of Court, which is not disputed by the respondent. 2. In the light of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the impugned order as a matter of form stands quashed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RHR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4