CRM-M-71938- IN THE H (106) PUSHPA RANI @ STATE OF PUNJ
CORAM: HON Present: Ms. G Mr. Ms. R Mr. K MANISHA BATR 1. Throu Bharatiya Nagarik seeks anticipatory Sections 333, 115 Khui Khera, Distri 2. Vide was released on in 3. Reply Learned counsel f -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH ANI @ PUSHPA DEVI Versus
PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS s. Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate for r. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, Pu Mr. Karnail Singh, Advocate for the c ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
Through the instant petition filed agarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for patory bail in case FIR No.172 dated , 115(2) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Ny , District Fazilka. Vide order dated 19.12.2025 passed on interim bail and was directed to jo Reply has been filed by learned c nsel for the complainant has argued th JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-71938-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 05.03.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA
e for for the petitioner G, Punjab r the complainant filed under Section 482 of the (for short ‘BNSS’), the petitioner dated 20.11.2025 registered under iya Nyaya Sanhita at Police Station passed by this Court, the petitioner d to join investigation. rned counsel for the complainant. gued that the petitioner was having a M) 2026 oner
the ioner nder ation ioner nant. ing a AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.06 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-71938- love affair with hi visiting the house forced her son to l the complainant. committed suicide 09.11.2025 has als against the petitio petition does not d 4. Learn states that the pet respondent-State 5. Learn not make out any part of the petition already joined inv allowed. 6. In vi investigation and g her pre-trial inc merits of case, it i bail is made out. A -2025 (O&M) 2 ith his son Sanju Kumar. She is a m house of the complainant, despite h on to live his life as per her wishes. S nant. It was on account of her behav suicide by hanging himself on 08.11 has also been registered and is being petitioner are serious in nature. It s not deserve to be allowed. Learned State counsel has filed statu he petitioner has joined investigation State, recovery of one axe has been eff Learned counsel for the petitioner has t any case for commission of offence petitioner. The subject offences are tr ed investigation. It is thus urged th In view of the fact that the petiti n and given the nature of allegations, l incarceration is not required. As s se, it is observed that a case for releas out. Accordingly, the petition is allo is a married woman. She had been pite her objections. She had even hes. She had even caused injuries to behavior that her son Sanju Kumar 08.11.2025. A DDR No.12 dated being inquired into. The allegations e. It is, therefore, argued that the d status report dated 22.01.2026 and igation on 21.12.2025. As per the een effected from the petitioner. ner has argued that the allegations do ffence of abetment of suicide on the s are triable by Magistrate. She has ged that the petition deserves to be petitioner has already joined the ions, this Court is of the opinion that . As such, without commenting on release of petitioner on anticipatory is allowed and the order 19.12.2025 been even es to umar ated tions he and r the s do the e has to be the that g on atory 2025 AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.06 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-71938- granting interim b conditions laid dow 7. Since if any, is rendered 05.03.2026 Amit Sharma


-2025 (O&M) 3 erim bail to the petitioner is made abso aid down in Section 482(2) of BNSS. Since the main petition has been disp dered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes 
 

e absolute, subject to compliance of NSS. en disposed of, pending application, (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
ce of tion, AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.06 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.