Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5316 (KAR)

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR v. M/S THE UGAR SUGAR WORKS LTD

WA/100239/2024 · 2025-01-21

B M Shyam Prasad, Ramachandra D Huddar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:988-DB WA No. 100239 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR WRIT APPEAL NO. 100239 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, INDIAN OIL BHAVAN, G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA-400051, REP. BY ITS SENIOR DEPOT MANAGER, SRI. R. SANAL. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. C.V. ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S THE UGAR SUGAR WORKS LTD., A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANY'S ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MAHAVEER NAGAR VAKHARBAGH, SANGLI-416416, MAHARASHTRA STATE, HAVING ITS FACTORY AT UGAR KHURD- 591316 TQ. KAGVAD, BELGAUM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS GPA HOLDER SRI. ANANT SHAMRAO SIDDANTI, S/O. SHAMRAO, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, GENERAL MANAGER, SUGAR CANE. 2. THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS JOINT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS (FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION) KRISHI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI 110001. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:988-DB WA No. 100239 of 2024 3. THE DIRECTOR (SUGAR), MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE OF SUGAR AND VEGETABLE OILS, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI – 110001. 4. THE SECRETARY OF MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GASES, SHATRI BHAVAN, DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD MARG, NEW DELHI – 110001. 5. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD., BHARAT BHAVAN, NO.4 AND 6 CURRIMBHOY ROAD, BELLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI-400001, MAHARASHTRA STATE. 6. THE HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD., PETROLEUM HOUSE NO. 17, JAMSHEDIJI TATA ROAD, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI - 400020 REP. BY ITS THE MANGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO, ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED. 25-04-2024 PASSED IN W.P. NO.100743/2024(GM-RES) & ETC., THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:988-DB WA No. 100239 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD) Sri. C.V. Angadi, the learned counsel for the appellant, submits that in similar circumstances the appellant’s request for dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn is accepted and this Court has disposed of such appeals accordingly, and that even in the present case the request for withdrawal is for the same reasons. This Court’s order dated 07.01.2025 in W.A. No.100240/2024 reads as under: “Sri C.V. Angadi, the learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the present appeal is filed as against the common order dated 25.04.2024 in a series of writ petitions [including W.P. No.100743/2024]; that the appellant is aggrieved by certain directions issued by the writ court, but the tender period has expired; that the appellant has initiated fresh tender process and therefore the memo is filed for withdrawal. Taking these submissions on record, the writ appeal stands disposed of.” In the light of the afore, the appeal stands disposed of on similar terms. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:988-DB WA No. 100239 of 2024 In view of the disposal of the appeal, all pending applications do not survive for consideration and stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (B.M.SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE RSH, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 32