IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 1064 of 2025 Kesh Bihari Choudhary …. Petitioner Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. R.B. Dash, Addl. P.P CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 22.09.2025 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks the intervention of this Court for a direction to the Opposite Party Nos.3 and 4 to carry out of the order passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Barbil in 1CC Case No.18 of 2023. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that pursuant to the complaint filed before the learned J.M.F.C., Baribil in the district of Keonjhar registered as 1CC Case No.18 of 2023, the learned court vide order dated 26.04.2024 issued a B.W./A. against the accused persons whereas, the same has not been executed by the authority and the court is awaiting for the execution of the said order as reveals from the order sheet dated 18.06.2024, 03.12.2024, 03.04.2025 and 18.06.2025. It is not understood that the court having passed the order is sitting mum in the matter without taking further step with regard to the non-implementation of the order passed by the Court. Needless to mention that the court must come heavily on the non-implementation of the judicial order passed by it instead of recording routine order sheets, which is not expected from the court concerned. While this Court is not inclined to pass any direction to the Opposite Party Nos. 3 & 4, it is directed that the court concerned shall be vigilant enough to ensure the execution of its own order by resorting to the provisions of the law and any laxity in this regard would mean that the court are functus officio after passing of such order and not being vigilant, if such order is not executed by the authority. The matter may be brought to the notice of the District Judge, as well as the Chief Judicial Magistrate to be taken up in the Police Magistrate meeting as well as the Senior Officer’s meeting for execution. 4. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to pass any other direction. 5. The CRLMP is accordingly disposed of. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Bijay