APHC010086272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 530/2025 Between: 1. S.NARASIMHUDU, S/O SWAMYDAS, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,VOA, BHAVITHA GRAMA SANGHAM, H.NO. 3/2, SC COLONY,KALUGOTIA VILLAGE,YEMMIGANUR MANDAL ANDHRA PRADESH-518360. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MADIGA RAJANNA, THE KANAKADHURGA CLUSTER COORDINATOR, SERP, KALUGOTIA (V),YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. GOWRA JAVA SREE, THE ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER, SERP, KALUGOTIA VILLAGE,YEMMIGANUR MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. BOYA RAGHAVENDRA, THE AREA COORDINATOR, SERP, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 11/09/25,VIDE IA NO-1 OF 2025 IN CC NO-530 OF 2025 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the respondents under sections 10 TO12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 21.11.2024 in W.P.No.25403 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the amendment of the cause title in the Contempt Petition by deleting the name of Respondent No. 3, “BOYA CHANDRA SEKHAR”, and substituting it with “BOYA RAGHAVENDRA” and it is further prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the office to duly carry out the necessary amendments in the affidavit, petition, and interlocutory application, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GANTA EDIGA RAKESH GOUD Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. HARI BABU MAGULURI SC For SERP The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Heard Sri Ganta Ediga Rakesh Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Hari Babu Maguluri, learned Standing counsel for the respondents. 2. The above contempt case is filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 21.11.2024 in W.P.No.25403 of 2024. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the action of respondents therein in not allowing the petitioner to discharge his duties as Village Organisation Assistant (VOA) in Bhavitha Village Women Mutually Aided Cooperative Thrift Society Ltd. @ Bhavitha Grama Sangham, Kalugotla village, as illegal and arbitrary. 4. The writ petition was disposed of directing respondents 3 to 6 therein not to interfere with the petitioner’s discharging his duties as Village Organisation Assistant (VOA) in Bhavitha Village Women Mutually Aided Cooperative Thrift Society Ltd. @ Bhavitha Grama Sangham, Kalugotla village. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was specifically pleaded that the respondents have violated the order dated 25403 of 2024. 6. Respondent No.1 filed counter by annexing resolution dated 05.10.2024. A perusal of the resolution discloses that the petitioner was removed as VOA and a new incumbent was elected by the members of the aforementioned society. However, the said fact was not pleaded in the writ affidavit. 7. No rejoinder was filed by the petitioner disputing the same. 8. Given the resolution, dated 05.10.2024, since the petitioner was removed as Village Orginasation Assistant (VOA) of Bhavitha Village Women Mutually Aided Cooperative Thrift Society Ltd. @ Bhavitha Grama Sangham, Kalugotla village, the contention of the petitioner that the order, dated 21.11.2024 is violated, has no merit. [ 9. Hence, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 21.11.2025 IKN