NITINKUMAR MADHUKARRAO PAGHURT v. VINAYAK PANDURANG BELOKAR AND OTHERS
CAO/1275/2023 · 2025-09-16
Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53155 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53155 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
26.cao.1275.23 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAO] No.1275 of 2023 in Civil Application [MCA] St. No.15758 of 2023 in Appeal Against Order No.16 of 2019 (D) Nitinkumar Madhukarrao Paghurt vs. Vinayak Pandurang Belokar and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A.D. Bhate, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Ms. Archana Lanjewar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 3, 4, 6 and 7.
CORAM:
ROHIT W. JOSHI,
J.
DATE : 16 th SEPTEMBER, 2025.
Heard.
02. For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of seven days caused in filing the restoration application is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. M.C.A. St. No.15758 of 2023 : 01 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the order of dismissal dated 04/07/2023 is recalled. Appeal Against Order No.16/2019 is restored to file. The application is allowed and
disposed of accordingly.
02. At the request of the learned Advocate for the appellant, stand over to 23/09/2025.
03. It is clarified that this Court has not granted any interim
order. All the concerned to note and act accordingly. JUDGE *sandesh 2025:BHC-NAG:9177