Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53147 (AP)

SHAIK JAMAL SAHIB & 2 ORS v. A.M.MURUGESAN & ANR

MACMA/1144/2006 · 2025-07-09

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No: M.A.C.M.A.No.1144 of 2006 1 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 07 07.05.2026 BSB,J I.A.No.1 of 2025 This petition is filed under the caption ‘for being mentioned’ at request of the learned counsel for the appellants / petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that while enhancing the amount of compensation from Rs.1,92,000/- to Rs.3,49,600/- with proportionate costs, there was no express mention about the interest payable on the principal amount of compensation enhanced, nor was it declined expressly, however, the Tribunal entertains a doubt and therefore, it is required to clarify about the same. No objection is raised from the other side. It is an inadvertent omission in expressly stating that the principal amount of compensation enhanced shall carry the interest at the same rate as was allowed by the Tribunal on the principal amount of compensation awarded by it. Accordingly, it is made clear that the amount of compensation enhanced in the appeal shall carry the same amount of interest as was granted by the Tribunal, from the date of the petition till the date of realization. Accordingly, the petition is ordered. __________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI,J NSM