APHC010043002020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2493/2020 Between: 1. KONDAPALLI SIVA NAGA MANIKANTA, S/O PATTABHI RAMARAO,HINDU, AGED ABOUT 29 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO 5-48/C, FLAT NO101,PATTAYYA TOWERS,NEAR EAST RAILWAY STATION, HUKUMPETA,RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL,SATILIGHT CITY, E.G.DT. -533107. 2. AGASTY SUBHA DHANALAKSHMI,, D/O.AGASTY CHAKRAVARTHY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 28 YRS, R/O.16B-7-39A,LANKAPETA 1ST ROAD, VENKATRAO PETA,TANGELLAMUDI,ELURU,W.G.DT- 534002. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DIST, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DIST. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST ZONE, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BOMMURU POLICE STATION, 2 EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. AGASTY CHAKRAVARTHI, R/O.16B-7-39A, LANKAPETA 1ST ROAD, VENKATRAO PETA, TANGELLAMUDI, ELURU, W.G.DT- 534 002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VASAVI RATNA KUMARI DANDAMUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2493 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 5th respondent in interfering with the petitioners personal lives with dire consequences at the instance of the unofficial respondent No.6 with regard to the marriage held between the petitioners, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, discriminatory and also in violation of the principles of natural justice and to consequently direct the respondents particularly the 5th respondent not to interfere with the petitioners personal lives with regard to the petitioners marriage as they have no jurisdiction and to pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2493 of 2020 Dated.02.09.2025 UPS 95