VIBHAS NARWAL v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS
CWP/12560/2025 · 2025-05-05
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53139 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53139 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-12560-2025 1 145
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12560-2025 Date of Decision: 05.05.2025 VIBHAS NARWAL
......... Petitioner Versus DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS
..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present : Mr. S.S. Mor, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for the respondents. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL
, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 30.01.2025 (Annexure P-10) whereby respondent has sanctioned Rs.12,046/- against medical bill of Rs.1,33,686/-.
2. The petitioner is claiming that he is serving in Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited as Assistant Sub Station Attendant. His wife delivered a girl child on 21.07.2024. She was subjected to cesarean, thus, a sum of Rs.1,33,686/- was incurred at the time of delivery. He lodged his medical claim for reimbursement, however, respondent sanctioned minuscule amount i.e. Rs.12,046/-. He filed representation with higher authorities. SDO (Operation) DHBVNL, Safidon has forwarded the matter to XEN (Operation). The said authority is sitting over the matter. Asgar Ali 2025.05.05 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-12560-2025 2
3. Mr. S.S. Mor, Advocate for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that grievance of the petitioner, at this stage, would be redressed if respondents are directed to decide his representation.
4. Notice of motion.
5. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate who on advance notice is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
6. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the case is taken up for final disposal.
7. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate submits that Competent Authority would address representation dated 20.02.2025 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order within two months from today.
8. In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 05.05.2025 Ali Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Asgar Ali 2025.05.05 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document