Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53138 (AP)

Udumula Lakshmi Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/15119/2024 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010301632024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15119/2024 Between: 1. UDUMULA LAKSHMI REDDY, S/O. LATE U. NARSA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CHINARIKATLA VILLAGE, KONAKANAMITLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, SECRETARIAT, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DARSI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KONANAMITLA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. UDUMULA JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, S/O. LATE VENKATAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. RESIDENT OF CHINARIKATLA VILLAGE, KONAKANAMITLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOKA DEVA DEEPAK ANIRUDH YADAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a direction, or an order or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.2 to 5 in not registering the F.I.R on the complaint dated 10.06.2024 of the petitioner against the respondent No.6 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and to pass.” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 ASR 175 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15119 of 2024 Dt.22.11.2025 ASR