Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5313 (RAJ)

RAJENDAR KUMAR SHARMA S/O RAM CHARAN SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2103/2025 · 2025-02-17

Sameer Jain

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6851] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2103/2025 Rajendar Kumar Sharma S/o Ram Charan Sharma, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Ram Bhawan, Near Ram Mandir, Gadarpura, Dholpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj And Rural Development, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Director, Elementary Education, State Of Rajasthan, Bikaner. 5. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neetu Bhansali for Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Raj for Mr. B. S. Chhaba, AAG Ms. Sara Parveen for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 17/02/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). [2025:RJ-JP:6851] (2 of 2) [CW-2103/2025] 2. Heard. 3. This Court directs Respondent No. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular dated 19.02.2024. 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/135