Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53126 (AP)

TEMPLE TREE ENERGY PVT.LTD., & 2 OTHERS, v. THE MINISTRY OF CORPORATION AFFAIRS, SECY., & ANOTHER,

WP/37294/2017 · 2025-11-04

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010872972017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37294/2017 Between: 1. TEMPLE TREE ENERGY PVT.LTD., & 2 OTHERS,, 16/377, SRINIVASA AGRAHARAM, VIJAY MAHAL CINEMA HALL GATE NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, PULIMI RAMESH REDDY. 2. PULIMI RAMESH REDDY,, S/O. P.V.SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O.16/377, SRINIVASA AGRAHARAM, VIJAY MAHAL CINEMA HALL GATE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. PULIMI RAJEEV,, S/O. RAMESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.16/377, SRINIVASA AGRAHARAM, VIJAY MAHAL CINEMA HALL GATE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE MINISTRY OF CORPORATION AFFAIRS SECY ANOTHER, 'A' WING, SHASTRI BHAWAN, RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, (ANDHRA PRADESH AND TELANGANA), 2ND FLOOR, CORPORATE BHAWAN, GSI POST, TATTIANNARAM NAGOLE, BANDLAGUDA, HYDERABAD - 500 068. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or any other proceedings one in the 2 JS,J W.P.No.37294/2017 nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in deactivating the DIN numbers 02986869 and 03013512 of the 2nd and 3rd petitioners respectively and restricting the petitioners from filing statutory returns, i.e., the annual returns and financial statements of the 1st petitioner company for the years 2011-12 to 2015-16 as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction, contrary of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 11 of the Companies (Appointment of Directors) Rules, 2014, violative of the principles of natural justice besides violating the petitioners' rights guaranteed under Article 14 and Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 46325 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 54367 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time granted vide orders in w.P. No. 37294/ 2017 dated 17-11- 2017 for a period of one week from today. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3 JS,J W.P.No.37294/2017 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.11.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.37294/2017 262 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37294/2017 Dated: 05.11.2025 KAS