HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14867 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Tripurari Pal, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Yagvalkya Pandey, learned AGA for the State-Respondent and perused the record. The present bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 300 of 2024, under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 67 of the I.T. Act, Police Station Bariyarpur, District Deoria. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the alleged incident took place on 11.11.2024 whereas the FIR has been registered on 22.12.2024, and delay of about one month and 12 days has not been explained. He further submits that the marriage of the deceased was fixed with the applicant and when the mother refused her marriage, she committed suicide. He submits that there is no evidence against the applicant to instigate the deceased to commit suicide. He submits that in the present case, charge-sheet has been filed and the applicant is not required for any custodial interrogation. In the post-mortem report, the cause of death is due to ante-mortem hanging. The applicant is languishing in jail since 27.12.2024. The applicant has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, the bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail, but could not dispute the above submissions raised by learned counsel for the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Tripurari Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep Kumar Pal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima- facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Sandeep Kumar Pal, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. September 15, 2025 pks BAIL No. 14867 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad