Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53120 (AP)

T. Nagamani v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/1713/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010023992021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1713/2021 Between: T. NAGAMANI, W/O. RAMA KRISHNA, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. HOUSE NO.29-310-182, RAJIV NAGAR, JANGAREDDYGUDEM (VIL) AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT., 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. MADAKAM MARY, W/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. RAJIV NAGAR, JANGAREDDYGUDEM (VIL) AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. MADAKAM STALLIN, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. RAJIV NAGAR, JANGAREDDYGUDEM (VIL) AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents l to 3 herein in taking action on petitioner's representation dated 16.12.2020 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently conduct fair investigation and take necessary action as per law.” 2. Sri P.Narahari Babu, learned for the Petitioner would submit that, let there be a direction to the Police to take action on the representation of the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that, based on the complaint given by the Petitioner, a case has been registered and hence, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1713 of 2021 Dt.14.10.2025 Dinesh