2025:UHC:3512 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 652 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Naveen Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned AGA along with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant–Chhaya W/o Sanjay Rajbhar alias Lokpal is in judicial custody since 26.03.2025 and seeking bail in relation to FIR/Case Crime No.0095 of 2025, registered on the basis of FIR dated 23.03.2025 at Police Station Kiccha, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein the present applicant along with one Shejal Gupta have been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 4,5 and 7 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (reconstructed SIT Act) & Section 143(2) of BNS 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated; there is no recovery from the present applicant of any article except one mobile phone, which does not belong to the applicant and the amount, which was shown to be recovered from the present applicant, belongs to the present applicant. Apart from this, he submits that the present applicant has no previous criminal history and she always cooperates with the investigation. 5. On the other side, Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned AGA for the State, has not disputed this fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history, however, he 2025:UHC:3512 submits that the investigation is still going on and if the applicant is enlarged on bail, she can influence the investigation. 6. After hearing the arguments, as advanced by learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the applicant has no previous criminal history, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the present bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant, namely, Chhaya, be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that after being released on bail, if the applicant is found to be indulged in future in any such activity, the respondent - State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail granted to her by this Court. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 06.05.2025 R.Bisht 2025:UHC:3512